CLARIVU – what is this ?

May 21st, 2011

I have had a number of requests from visitors to bettersight.co.uk asking what is CLARIVU ?

There are at the moment a number of articles appearing in the press on CLARIVU – I will try and explain what this is.

Clarivu is a name given to any type of lens implant vision correction procedure that is aimed at securing excellent distance viewing without glasses (driving, wathcing tv etc)  whilst simultaneously acheiving great close vision without reading glasses. Clarivu is therefore not a single procedure but could entail anyone of  one of the four following procedures;

Clarivu is therefore essentially a process rather than a single procedure with the aim of the surgeon being complete vision correction. You can see for yourselves the excellent results that we can achieve when we combine personlaised surgical techniques with the state of the art equipment that is now mandatory for this type of highly specialised process that is growing almost exponentially in popularity. I personally suspect that over the next few years very few people over the age of 45 will be having LASER vision correction when such outstanding results can be acheived with various forms of implant vision correction.

Drop me a line to find out more.

Ozurdex – A Steroid implant for Macular Swelling disorders

April 20th, 2011

There have been some reports in the press regarding a new kind of implant that can be of help in combating a condition called macular oedema. Swelling (oedema) of the macula can arise from a number of different conditions – the commonest are outlined below;

Retinal Vein occlusion (thrombosis) of a vein in the retina  -affects around 20,ooo patients per year in the UK

Diabetic eye disease (diabetic maculopathy) – a very common cause of vision decline in diabetic patients.

Other disorders of the blood vessels in the retina

Inflammation related swelling (uveitis or iritis)

Wet Age related macular degeneration (wet AMD)

Ozurdex is a new treatment that is specifically designed for implantation into the eye. it releases a particualr kind of steroid called Dexamethasone – a dose of 700 micrograms is impregnated into the device. Unlike previous liquid formulations the device can release the dose of steroid gradually over a 3-4 month period. Also previous steroid formulations were not licensed for the eye and have fallen out of favour because we now have a properly formulated, designed for the eye device. Ozurdex has proven to be quite effective against macular oedema especially in retinal vein occlusion. Some studies also indicate that it may have a role to play in diabetic eye disease , inflammation related swelling. There are even some reports suggesting that it could have a additive role in combating resistant cases of wet AMD when used in conjunction with Lucentis (Ranibizumab).

Patients who have vision decline caused by any of the conditions shown above and have not suffered for more than 1 year could be suitable for consideration of this therapy.

Please e mail me if you have any further questions.

The Ozurdex steroid Implant - on a finger !

Real example of macular swelling reduction in a Ozurdex patient

Diabetic Macular Oedema : Whats beyond Laser ?

October 18th, 2010

For over 25 years laser treatment (often called photocoagulation) has been the absolute mainstay of treatment for one of the commonest causes of vision loss in people of working age – namely diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Recent work however is shedding more light on the possible additive effects of other treatments to augement laser treatment for DMO.

A trial involving 691 patients found that Lucentis injection (as for AMD) followed by prompt or delayed laser treatment provided a significantly better vision outcome. Results published in ophthalmology 2010;117:1064-77, showed that at one year the average change in vision from baseline was as follows;

Lucentis followed by laser treatment within one week : 9 letter (approx two line) vision improvement.

Lucentis followed by laser delayed for at least 24 weeks : 9 letter vision improvement

Triamcinolone (a steroid injection) followed by prompt laser : 4 letter improvement

Sham plus laser treatment (effectively the control group) : 3 letter improvement.

In addition approximately a half of patients on the Lucentis protocols recorded a substantial 10 letter improvement whilst around 1/3 showed 15 or more letter gain in vision (this is equivalent to 3 lines on a standard chart).

This is all very exciting – but right now in the UK Lucentis is not a recognised treatment for DMO – it is not yet licensed for this purpose and nor has it been formally evaluated by NICE – thus obtaining NHS funding for Lucentis in DMO will be a case by case battle with local funding organisations – namely Primary care trusts.  The more that patients are aware of these sorts of outcomes the more that patient power can help advance the case for these “options” to be made readily accessible for all patients.

Avastin V Lucentis in wet AMD

October 7th, 2010

Ever since the Avastin – a drug licensed for intravenous injection in patients with certain forms of cancer has gained widespread popularity as a off-label treatment for wet AMD there have been many calls for further investigating its treatment effect – in particular there has been a desire to see how well this relatively cheap drug performs in comparison with what is currently the “gold standard” (and expensive) treatment for wet AMD – Lucentis injections.  Remember these two drugs work in very similar ways against the same molecule (called vegf-A). We are now beginning to see studies coming through that have investigated this very issue. These small study’s referenced below have not shown any clear difference in vision outcomes in properly conducted clinical trial’s. Broadly speaking Avastin treatment appears equivalent in effect for these two drugs.

Eye (Lond). 2010 Oct 1. [Epub ahead of print

Avastin v Lucentis for AMD : 1 year outcomes of a prospective, double masked randomised clinical trial.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Dec;148(6):875-82.e1. Epub 2009 Oct 2.

Avastin v Lucentis for AMD : Early results of a prospective double masked, randomised clinical trial.

Obviously further larger studies are required – and are underway but despite industry efforts to quash the use of Avastin (in the UK this is primarily in situations where NHS funding is not available because strict entry criteria for Lucentis treatment are not met) there is growing real evidence and not just clinicians personal experiences that bolster the case for considering Avastin in special situations.

Triple Therapy in wet AMD: A new kind of approach

October 5th, 2010

There have been a number of recent articles published in medical journals describing the results of a combination approach to tackling wet age related macular degeneration. The articles references are listed below;

Ophthalmic Res. 2010 Sep 17;45(3):129-134. [Epub ahead of print]

Forte RBonavolontà PBenayoun YAdenis JPRobert PY.  Eye Department, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.

Intravitreal Ranibizumab & Bevacizumab in combination with full fluence Verteporfin therapy & Dexamthesaone for exudative age related macular degeneration.

Retina. 2007 Feb;27(2):133-40.

Augustin AJPuls SOffermann I. Department of Ophthalmology, Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany. 106020.560@compuserve.com

Triple therapy for choroidal neovascularisation due to {wet} age related macular degeneration : Verteporfin PDT, bevacizumab & dexamethasone.

Retina. 2009 May;29(5):573-8.  Bakri SJCouch SMMcCannel CAEdwards AO.

Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. sbakri@hotmail.com

Same day triple therapy with photodynamic therapy, intravitreal dexamethasone & bevacizumab in wet age related macular degeneration.

Can J Ophthalmol. 2010 Feb;45(1):36-40 Ehmann DGarcía R.

Pasqua Hospital Eye Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Regina, Sask., Canada

Triple therapy for neovascular age related macular degeneration (verteporfin photodynamic therapy, intravitreal dexamethasone & intravitreal bevacizumab)

A detailed critique of these interesting publications is beyond the scope of this blog but in essence what these research articles have suggested is that

a) Triple therapy appears to be safe

b) Triple therapy meets or exceeds expected outcomes of wet amd treatment with conventional single therapy treatment regimes (generally Ranibizumab [Lucentis] or Bevacizumab [Avastin])

c) There appears to be a clear signal that triple therapy using Photodynamic therapy [formerly the most commonly used therapy for wet AMD], Anti Vegf injections and a steroid intraocular injection may help to reduce the expected number of treatments required for the management of wet AMD.

At present most patients with wet AMD can expect an average of 7-8 injections of Lucentis in the first year of therapy and 5-6 injections in the second year of therapy – and quite possibly more treatments into year 3 and 4 as well. Any approach that can reduce the number of treatments required for a patient would be regarded very favourably both by patients and by doctors !

I suspect that in time there may be many more people undergoing this type of initially intensive regime of treatment for this serious eye condition – but as ever more evidence would be very welcome !

Delay between medical indication to anti-VEGF treatment in age-related macular degeneration can result in a loss of visual acuity.

September 28th, 2010

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complicated approval procedures and limited short-term surgical capacities can result in time delays between the definition of a medical indication for ranibizumab treatment in active neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and the starting of treatment. This study aimed to evaluate changes in visual acuity and central retinal thickness over time, and their consequences for the patients concerned.

METHODS: Sixty-nine patients indicated for first-time ranibizumab treatment and 21 patients with necessary re-treatment were included in the study. Visual acuity and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) central retinal thickness at the time of the indication examination were compared to values at the first-time treatment and during recurrent ranibizumab treatment.

RESULTS: For first-time treatment, the delay between indication and treatment was significantly higher for patients with vision loss compared to those without vision loss (31.6 ± 20.5 vs. 24.0 ± 8.3 days, p = 0.012). The increase in OCT central retinal thickness was 50.4 ± 92.8 μm for patients with vision loss compared to 5.1 ± 63.4 μm for those without vision loss, p = 0.029. A 1.1 logMAR line difference in vision loss was significant at p = 0.01 for patients with a delay in treatment of less than or equal to 28 days (48/69 patients, 69.7%) compared to those with a delay of more than 28 days (21/69 patients, 30.3%).

CONCLUSIONS: Even though average visual decay was slow at about one logMAR line over 110 days, individual patients (8.7%) experienced rapid loss of one or more lines within 21 days. Administrative procedures should therefore be expedited so that delays do not exceed 2 weeks for the sake of vision preservation in individual patients.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010 Sep 24 Epub

This article attempts to study what many doctors (and patients!) already know – that delay in starting anti vegf treatment (with Lucentis or Avastin depending on local funding channels) does not bode well for outcomes for this condition. Timely first treatment and timely retreatments as required are still the key to achieving good outcomes in wet AMD treatment.

Improving accuracy of lens implant selection in cataract surgery

September 22nd, 2010

This article caught my eye (no pun intended :)  

Ref : Ophthalmology 2010; 117:49-54

“Intraocular lens power selection in the second eye of patients undergoing bilateral, sequential cataract extractions”

One of the key objectives of modern customised cataract surgery is to be able to achieve a target optical prescription following the operation. This aim is even more important with bifocal/multifocal lens implants. Current measurement technology with infra-red laser methods of eye measurement are increidibly accurate but inherent -biological variability can still play a role in the evnetual outcome. Because it is still normal to treat each eye separately with a week or two delay before second eye surgery, it has long been recognised that assessing the optical outcome of the first eye treated could be a useful predictor of the second eye operation. Most of the patients that I treat will have a full optician style eyesight test in between the two operations. More often than not the outcome is predicted – ie we were aiming for a target prescritption of -0.25dioptres and thats what we got – but what if the initial outcome is different to what was the ‘predicted’ prescription ?  This can throw up a quandary – do you

a) stick with the initial measurements and the calculated lens implant power as per the first calculations or

b) Carry out repeat measurement for both eyes and look for consistency of measurements  or

c) Alter the predicted lens power requirement  - and if so by how much ?

I have usually taken a combination of b and c here – repeating the eye measurements allows us to get a sense of the repeatability and consistency of the measurements – given the kind of technology I have the privelege of using this is nearly always the case – but its reassuring nevertheless. I have usually then adjusted the called for lens implant power by half of the observed prediction error seen in the first operation. So if we were aiming for a zero prescription but actually got a +1.00 refraction , then for the second eye (assuming consistent measurements) we could aim for minus 0.50D instead of zero. “Fudging” the calculation in this way has been used intuitively for some time but we now have some good research evidence backing up this approach in a study involving 300 operations where just this approach was used and the researchers found significantly improved accuracy in the second operation.

The inherent biological variability that makes us all different is also what makes it impossible to achieve precise optical / visual outcomes after cataract or refractive lens exchange surgery. This is why it is imperitive to be able to offer our patients the opportunity of “fine tuning” the eyesight after this type of surgery using LASIK or LASEK - this is an integral part of my approach to customised cataract or refractive lens exchange surgery today.

Personalised Treatment for AMD- Are we there yet ?

September 19th, 2010

Are we there yet ? A familiar cry to all parents , the typical response – nearly – could aptly describe the current position with the emerging science of pharmacogenomics – the concept of using genetic analysis to guide medical treatment. Though currently in an embryonic stage of devleopment this concept is growing rapidly and when it comes to AMD there has been a slew of recent research that could pave the way for a whole new way of treating conditions such macular degeneration. In summary below is a list of genetic associations with AMD that also may have some relevance in treatment/ intervention responses;

Complement Factor H Y402H gene type : correlates with a more aggresive type of wet AMD (predominantly classic type) and poorer outcomes with Photodynamic therapy & Avastin injection therapy in patients who had two copies of this gene variation that is strongly linked to AMD.

Genes for placental growth factor have also been implicated in suboptimal responses to standard wet AMD treatments

Overall 3 AMD gene variants – CFH Y402H, ARMS2 A69S and C3 R80G account for around 76% of risk of AMD development.

Complement factor H variant in particular has also shown some impact on the value of Zinc supplementation in AMD progression with a greater beneficial effect being seen in patients who did not have the high risk CFH gene variant (68% v 11%) in other words patients who have two “bad” copies of the CFH gene are much less likely to gain the standard known benefit that Zinc confers on “average” AMD patients.

Summary : Current research is rapidly buliding up a picture of a range of genetic variants that are implicated in the development of AMD, furthermore gentetic testing may become an invaluable tool in helping to select the appropriate treatment programme for both dry AMD and wet AMD in the very near future.  Nearly There !

Are Flavanoids the New Carotenoids ?

September 18th, 2010

Indulging in dark chocolate a little may not be all bad !

At the Yorkshire Retina Society meeting on 17th September 2010 there were a number of intersting presentations on AMD in particular. One presentation from Professor Usha Chkaravarty, Queens University, Belfast provided an update on current thinking with respect to AMD prevention. Whilst Carotenoids (Lutein, Zeaxanthin & Meso-Zeaxanthin) have long been considered beneficial for the “slowing down of AMD” there have been some reports linking Bioflavanoids to a protective effect against macular degeneration.

Bioflavanoids are widley distributed  plant compounds and are the most important plant pigments for flower colloration – producing yellow and red/blue pigmentation designed to attract pollinator animals. Experimental evidence suggests that they may act as biological “response modifiers” and could play a role against inflammation. From a macular degeneration perspective they also appear to have powerful anti-oxidant properties. Though there is debate as to whether this is direct or indirect – in other words dietary flavanoids may actually work by increasing uric acid levels that result from the metabolism of these compounds.

As such there is no large scale clinical trial investigating the impact of dietary bioflavanoids in the battle against AMD but there does appear to be some role here that clearly requires further investigation.

What should AMD patients do – my suggestion at this stage is to stick with the following measures;

1) Stop Smoking – every research study has shown consistently that smoking is THE single most important factor that patients can actually do something about

2) If you are a non smoker or have not smoked for more than 10 years – Use AREDS style supplementation with either VITEYES AREDS formula or Ocuvite Preservsion AREDS formula.

3) Consider supplementing with Lutein and Zeaxanthin as well

4) If you are a smoker – you may benefit from VITEYES somkers formula

5) To increase dietary intake of FLAVNOIDS – consider adding the following to your diet;

a) Citrus Fruits

b) Red Onions

c) Pulses

d) Tea _ green tea especially

e) Red wine  - in moderation !

f) Dark Chocolate (>70% cocoa) agian in moderation

Stem Cell Therapy for Macular Degeneration

September 15th, 2010

stem cells under a microscope

A great deal has been written about stem cells – often described as the holy grail of modern medicine. In a condition such as AMD where cell loss and scarring are at the centre of the problem stem cells do in principle offer a way to recover lost function ie eyesight. How do they work ?

Every cell in the body contains a code (the DNA) that in theory contains all the information to make that cell into any kind of cell. Many cells in the body are not programmed to regenerate – this is especially true for the vision receptor cells in the retina, once damaged they cannot regrow. However researchers have found that “embryonic” cells can be coaxed into turning into specialised cells such as photoreceptr cells. Many groups are involved in research trying to regenerate cells.

Professor Coffey’s group in London is working on treating AMD with a single layer of retinal pigment epithelium (support cells for the retina) derived from human embryoinc stem cells. This procedure involves transplantation of these cells into the damaged area of the macula. Human clinical trials may begin as early as 2011 if successful, eye surgeons may be able to perform this procedure as early as 2015.  One problem that still hasnt been fully dealt with is tissue rejection – though the unique structure of the eye makes it a less active part of the body for rejection to occur – it would still be a possibility – clearly much more research is required before these treatments become available – but nevertheless genuinely exciting prospects ahead for AMD sufferers.